Raffael Schaer vs Janis Raffael Simmen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W L L W L L
Form
W L L L L W L L W LHead-To-Head: Schaer 1 - 1 Simmen
They have played 5 sets in total, with Schaer winning 2 and Simmen winning 3. The last match between Schaer and Simmen was at the M15 Bern, 27-06-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Raffael Schaer getting the victory 5-7 6-4 10-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Raffael Schaer | 1 |
| Janis Raffael Simmen | 1 |
M15 Bern(27-06-2022)
5
7
6
4
10
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Shnaider VS Sevastova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-4 10-4 |
Stats 
Raffael Schaer
Player
Janis Raffael Simmen
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Janis Raffael Simmen
Player
Raffael Schaer
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 29 | Games Won | 27 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:31:30 | Average Match Time | 1:31:30 |
| 61% (83/135) | 1st Serve % | 66% (88/133) |
| 64% (53/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (62/88) |
| 54% (28/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (23/45) |
| 44% (4/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (6/14) |
| 36% (48/133) | Return Points Win % | 40% (54/135) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (2/1) |
| 50% (2/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Raffael Schaer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 3-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Ezekiel Clark
Player
Raffael Schaer
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 3-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 1-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dimitris Sakellaridis
Player
Raffael Schaer
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
view more
Janis Raffael Simmen Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
David Eichenseher
Player
Janis Raffael Simmen
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
2
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
0
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
23 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 4-6 10-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Jonas Schaer
Player
Janis Raffael Simmen
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
48 of
87)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
42 of
87)
79
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Janis Raffael Simmen
Player
Gian Gruenig
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
55 of
89)
6
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(2) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jonas Schaer
Player
Janis Raffael Simmen
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
84)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
6
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alessandro Pecci
Player
Janis Raffael Simmen
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
78%
(
35 of
45)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Raffael Schaer
Player
Janis Raffael Simmen
65%
(
51 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
44%
(
34 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-4 10-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Georgii Kravchenko
Player
Janis Raffael Simmen
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Janis Raffael Simmen
Player
Andre Windler
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
54 of
82)
2
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
27%
(
7 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
6 of
28)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
48%
(
32 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
73
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 7-6(4) 10-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (61/71) | Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) |
| 47% (140/156) | Sets Win/Loss | 41% (11/16) |
| 49% (1436/1478) | Games Win/Loss | 46% (136/161) |
| 43% (31/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (27/27) | Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) |
| 50% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.36 |
| 50 | Aces Total | 53 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 222 | Total Double Faults | 42 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:17:14 |
| 231.71 | Average Opponent Rank | 113.91 |
| 62% (2529/4053) | 1st Serve % | 60% (375/628) |
| 59% (1499/2529) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (257/375) |
| 45% (679/1524) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (105/253) |
| 42% (177/422) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (17/40) |
| 42% (1621/3891) | Return Points Win % | 37% (219/590) |
| 46% (61/71) | Futures W/L | 36% (4/7) |
| 46% (59/128) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 56% (15/27) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 42% (15/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 78% (67/52) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 22% (67/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 11% (65/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (7/1) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
